A tablet is more expensive than a PS3. The argument that Vita is more expensive than a PS3 is invalid. The device is made with 2010-2011 hardware. PS3 has been on the market for 5 years and the Hardware is about 6 years old. As the hardware ages, the value goes down.

You can’t because there is no way to make a PS3 emulator run on a Vita. To emulate a system, your host must be more powerful than what it’s trying to emulate. The opposite is true in this case, with the Vita being a slower console than its full-size counterpart. However, a hacker figured out a way to stream games from PS3 to Vita. This is

lol the PS3 is more powerfull than and has only sold 53million copies while the wii has sold 89million copies which means that power doesnt matter. also lets remember the PSP DS everyone said that the PSP would outsell the DS because PSP was more powerfull and shit. it ended with the PSP selling 66million copies and the DS selling 151million

Nvidia’s Senior vice president of content and technology, Tony Tamasi, expects the next crop of mobile devices to outperform current generation consoles, claiming the Xbox 360 and PS3 can barely
The general rule for emulation is that the device running the emulator will need to multiple times more powerful (typically around 10 times more). The Vita isn't all that fast. The version of Minecraft it has has been reduced to work on the Vita and still stutters a bit. Many modern cell phones are more powerful than the Vita. To borrow from an 3. Games on the PlayStation Vita are more often compared to PS3 titles than PSP, which could make developers wary of high development costs. But in a Gamasutra interview, Sony Worldwide Studios . 32 70 257 291 91 134 54 160 211

is ps vita more powerful than ps3